A home’s frame is its core source of stability, and therefore it is imperative that it remains strong and sturdy. It is important to know the facts about steel vs timber frames before building your biggest lifetime investment.
In the ongoing debate about steel vs timber frames, there are a number of myths that may lead to confusion among new home builders. It is essential to understand the implications that your framing choice will have on future costs and maintenance for your home when choosing between steel vs timber frames for your new home.
The risk of building with timber frames
It is well known that timber is the old fashioned method of new home construction. It provides the opportunity for framing errors to be fixed on-site by hammer and nail, which is a cheap and fast option for the new home builder, but not so reassuring for the home owner. Timber frames contain natural imperfections and weak points, making them highly susceptible to damage. Timber frames can be easily damaged during transport and erection, as well as long-term damage via termite infestation or rot. The costs of this damage can be substantial, and lead to instability of your entire home. In contrast, Supaloc steel frames are precision engineered to be strong, perfectly straight, and most importantly, 100% termite proof.
According to Archicentre, in Australia, 1 in every 5 homes will be infested by termites within a five year period1. The costs associated with these infestations are commonly in excess of $40,0002.
The recommended termite inspections and chemical treatments cost an additional $830 a year3, with limited success in the prevention of termite attack. Supaloc steel frames prevent the need for these ongoing costly expenses. In the steel vs timber frame debate, when it comes to protecting your new home from termite damage, steel framing is clearly the right choice.